atf pistol brace comment template

Doing the template will: 1- allow ATF to clump them up as one comment 2- allow ATF to disregard them as bots or spam. The ATF is allowing comments until Jan 4th of 2021 regarding the re-classification of Pistol Braces. There is, however, a clear burden that will be placed on the millions of American citizens who currently possess braced firearms. The guidelines are entirely subjective, arbitrary, and nonsensical. With the leak of a new letter showing that ATF is opening up a public comment period ahead of finalizing their “Objective Factors for Classifying Weapons with Stabilizing Braces” document, there is renewed fear of an impending pistol brace ban. In what’s being spun as a “holistic” approach to regulation (A.K.A. The ATF noted in the document published Friday that it is seeking comments from the public before moving forward with the pistol brace regulations. Also, abide by the rules of the comment forum (no profanity, complete name and address info, etc. The ATF turned over the document that alleged the popular pistol brace company SB Tactical had “misinformed the public about its pistol braces’ legality“.The ATF … Which is against the Gun Control Act which provides a 90-day comment period. These “features” do not appear anywhere in the US Code: • Type and Caliber ATF recently published a notice in the Federal Register that has the gun world up in arms – and it’s being reported as a ban on pistol braces. SAVING BRACE: ATF Rescinds Notice Of Weapons With Stabilizing Braces. It is very important you all follow these instructions and voice your opinion. • Sights and Scopes This massive ban resulted in less than 1% of the existing devices being removed from circulation. • Attachment Method Like others have said, comment using original language and not a copy pasta template. Yes, it even opened for comment over the holidays—how nice of the ATF. The pistol braces acceptance will be based on a set of criteria by the ATF. Well, in recent news, the ATF seems to be formalizing plans for a pistol brace ruling. Comments will be accepted by the agency until Jan. 4. That’s not true, because the document doesn’t actually do anything. That criteria includes: caliber, weight, length, design of brace, if it can be fired one handed, and what type of optic or accessory is on the firearm. The letter needs proper formatting and what not, but that's on you. We need your input to make sure our comment letter reflects the questions, concerns and voice of the firearm and ammunition industry. ... What makes a pistol brace a brace? Further regulation on these devices serves no public interest, while simultaneously depriving law-abiding citizens of their right to possess the firearm of their choosing. Now, over eight years after your initial determination, you are soliciting comments on what the ATF is calling “objective design features” with an apparent goal of determining that many firearms with rifled bores that are shorter than 16 inches are short barreled rifles (SBRs). I don’t think “Objective” means what they think it means, however, since … Continue reading "A … The letter states that for gun owners … During that time to leave comment. We CANNOT use copypasta. Also: Neither the letter nor the comment indicate in any way whether or not the author has an arm brace. Religious Institution Concealed Carry Passes its Second Hurdle. What evidence is there to suggest stricter regulations on stabilizing braces will be any more effective? GPM has reported repeatedly that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms’ (ATF) was on the verge of making millions of law-abiding gun owners criminals overnight. But if the federal government really wants to find out what you do or do not have, I doubt they need a comment to do it. The pro-gun group Gun Owners of America pointed out in a press release that, contrary to the new guidance, the ATF has issued approval letters for pistol braces in the past. I would recommend you send the letter as well, as it is has a longer and more detailed section about how useless the "objective design features" are. The proposal seeks to evaluate AR pistol with braces on a case by case bases. It was published in the Federal Register yesterday, as Docket No. Additionally, the selected set of “objective design features” appears to be anything but objective. All comments must reference this document’s docket number, ATF 2020R-10, be legible, and include the commenter’s complete first and last name and full mailing address. We can use the somewhat-similar example of the 2018 “bump-stock” ban as a case study. People who have a vested interest could leave comments on ATF’s proposed new guidance on pistol braces. Your full mailing address (required), I am submitting comments in opposition to proposed regulations posted on December 18 and entitled “Objective Factors for Classifying Weapons with ‘Stabilizing Braces.’”. There is no evidence to suggest that regulating braced firearms under the NFA will reduce crime rates in any way. Not only do these terms NOT appear in the US Code, they are subject to varying interpretations. The guidance, posted on the Federal Register on Dec. … As I’m sure you know, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives recently published a proposed rule in the Federal Register. On Wednesday night the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) withdrew a proposed guidance that would have reclassified millions of AR-15 style pistols and other weapons with braces that stabilize a user's wrist when firing, to short-barreled rifles, which are much more heavily regulated. Yes, it even opened for comment over the holidays—how nice of the ATF. Comments can also be submitted at: https://www.federalregister.gov/public-inspection/2020-27857/objective-factors-for-classifying-weapons-with-stabilizing-braces. These delightful accessories therefore infringe upon the government’s infringement upon an American gun owner’s Constitutional right to configure their firearms however they wish (an intentionally convoluted … ATF is accepting comments from all interested persons on the use of the objective factors listed in this document. Submitted by: Frank Nedza. Regulating firearms with attached stabilizing arms braces is entirely needless and serves no purpose other than to burden law abiding citizens. There is no evidence to suggest the average American will be safer by subjecting braced firearms within the purview of the NFA. For example, a firearm that is considered heavy and long by a small statured person could just as easily be considered light and short by a larger framed person. ), otherwise it will be disregarded. Presumably, future braced pistol purchases would not be exempt and new owners would have to pay the $200 fee. On December 22, 2020, Breitbart News informed readers that the ATF had posted guidance for AR pistol reclassification to the Federal Register. All comments must reference this document’s docket number, ATF 2020R-10, be legible, and include the commenter’s … Update: The ATF announced that it has “withdrawn its guidance” concerning pistol braces, which means pistol brace guidelines will remain as they are, for the time being. If I submit my comment in support of the SBA3 brace, I’m doing my part, but then I’m placing myself squarely in the ATF’s radar – and by extension the CADOJ – as an AR pistol owner. ATF Solicits Public Comment on Pistol Brace Re-Classification. So I figured I would give people an example/ideas on what to say. Pistol braces allow American gun owners to enjoy better control of their big-boned handguns. As of 12/16/2020, a lot of things have come down the pipe when it comes to Pistol Braces/Stabilizers and the ATF/DOJ. Please delete it. With millions of braced firearms in the hands of law-abiding citizens, it is evident that braced firearms are both in “common use” and used for “lawful purposes.” An explanation the ATF could offer as to what their defense will be when these regulations are taken to court would be appreciated. Alert: Stop Congress from Packing the Court! Teresa Mull Dec 23, 2020 0 Comments. After receiving more than 50,000 comments in just a matter of days, the Bureau of Alcohol, Firearms, Tobacco, and Explosives appears to be putting its proposed guidance on pistol … 2020R–10. They will have to fill out lengthy paperwork and submit sensitive personal information for the permission to keep the property they have lawfully purchased. It is clearly obvious that ATF is attempting to write the law instead of enforcing the laws that Congress has enacted. The rub was that all of us succumbed to the inevitable temptation to fire brace-equipped pistols from the shoulder. GOA suggests you copy and paste the text below if you’re unsure what to say. Also, abide by the rules of the comment forum (no profanity, complete name and address info, etc. In light of this, the ATF says it “must evaluate whether a particular firearm configured with a stabilizing brace bears the objective features of a firearm designed and intended to be fired from the shoulder, and thus subject to the NFA, on a case-by-case basis.” The ATF is taking public comment via the Federal Register through January 4, 2021. ATF Solicits Public Comment on Pistol Brace Re-Classification. But searching regulations.gov may or may not turn up the docket. Posted December 23, 2020 in Breaking News, Daily News, News, Pistol Stabilizing Brace, Pistols by Pete with No Comments Tags: atf, Pistol Braces, Stabilizing Braces There is absolutely no statutory authority to regulate accessories such as: • Secondary Grip Whoops. I would at least recommend you modify this comment/letter so they won't all be lumped together, but that's up to you. In other words, the ATF claims it does not and has not ruled that any make or model of pistol brace exempts all firearms from NFA classification. While it does not appear a conclusive figure was determined, it appears that, at most, a few thousand bump-stocks were surrendered, abandoned, of destroyed in compliance with the ATF’s new ruling on the device. ATF will not consider, or respond to, comments that do not meet these requirements or comments containing excessive profanity. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts, https://www.regulations.gov/document?D=ATF-2020-0001-0001, https://www.federalregister.gov/public-inspection/2020-27857/objective-factors-for-classifying-weapons-with-stabilizing-braces, https://docs.google.com/document/d/1GCSE7OY0qwbrnWVMwS0XVcpd8bT5r7XpnEIN6mjid7Q/edit?usp=sharing. lhttps://docs.google.com/document/d/1GCSE7OY0qwbrnWVMwS0XVcpd8bT5r7XpnEIN6mjid7Q/edit?usp=sharing). FREE Tax Stamp = Biggest Gun Registration In History. 8001 Forbes Place - Suite 202 Springfield, VA 22151, try clicking here to submit a formal comment, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k0UNInVQl4Q, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KkhZgTybMQE, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yIgCEBZrbNw, Commissioner Rovella Responds to GOA Letter on Concealed Carry Permits, GOA-Endorsed Constitutional Carry Becomes Law in Montana, We need your help to disband the broken “gun line”…, A Hypocritical Biden “Virtue Signals” His Extreme Gun Control Agenda, Encourage Governor DeSantis to Use His “Bully Pulpit” for Gun Rights. By: Teresa Mull. It is reasonable to assume that this figure is supplemented by the dozens of other types of stabilizing braces. This was an undeniably noble pursuit. The new, design based “features” are not objective, they are clearly subjective and look like they are designed and intended to bring your agency’s rule-making to a predetermined outcome. There is not a correlation, let alone a causal link between the presence of braced firearms and higher crime rates. In a Notice issued yesterday by the Associate Deputy Director of the ATF, the agency has officially withdrawn its pistol brace proposal that GOA had alerted you to here. The National Shooting Sports Federation (NSSF) is also asking for comments. That’s a good start, but we still need gun owners and Second Amendment supporters to add their voice to the … This proposed regulation also appear to attempt to skirt around District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 and United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174. In it, the ATF purports to “Objectively” define the criteria under which a braced pistol magically becomes a Short Barreled Rifle. If the button doesn’t work, try clicking here to submit a formal comment. ATF was advised by the first manufacturer to submit an arm brace for classification that the intent of the arm brace was to facilitate one-handed firing of the AR15 pistol for those with limited strength or mobility due to a handicap, and to reduce bruising to the forearm when firing with one hand. There is not one single guideline which is clear established in anything resembling an objective manner. Nonetheless, the ATF is taking comment before it makes its final decision. ATF Withdrawals Pistol Brace Threat. The public comment period for the ATF’s proposed rules for pistol stabilizing braces just opened last Friday, but already more than 13,000 comments have been received by the agency. Doing the template will: 1- allow ATF to clump them up as one comment 2- allow ATF to disregard them as bots or spam. Millions of law-abiding American citizens took ATF at its word when the agency approved the installation of so-called “stabilizing braces” onto firearms receivers and promised that said firearms were handguns and not rifles. A few days ago they released a draft detailing a proposed “re-imagination” of pistol braces on firearms. The ATF’s proposed rule for determining whether a firearm is a stabilizer-braced pistol or a short-barreled rifle is open for comments. Commenters where giving from December 18th- Jan 1st, 2021. Press J to jump to the feed. The ATF has accomplished nothing with these guidelines other than turn millions of Americans into Schrodinger’s felon; individuals who possess a braced firearm both are and are not in possession of an illegal SBR, and they won’t be able to tell which it is until they submit it for evaluation, which they are not required to do in the first place. It’s a guidance document, sort of an official announcement of ATF policy, but ATF policy is not law. ATF has the authority (within limits set by Congress) to regulate firearms and ammunition in interstate commerce. We’ve pulled all the essential info together to walk you through the brace’s humble beginnings, how AR pistols got involved, and the long-standing feud with the ATF over what you can (and can’t do) with a brace.. Buckle up. IMPORTANT EDIT Please read all the rules of commenting. That isn’t happening. Use OP’s post as a foundation for your comment and personalize it to you. For the above listed reasons, I hereby request that the ATF clarify its positions further, and establish specific, objective standards by which stabilizing braces and the firearms they are attached to are to be measured. SUBMIT YOUR COMMENT TO THE ATF ↗ If the button doesn’t work, try clicking here to submit a formal comment. How does the ATF possibly intend to enforce the mandatory registration of these braces, should a given braced firearm be determined to be an SBR? This violates the Separation of Powers, not to mention the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. • Stabilizing Brace Design Features. I urge you to reject this idea at once and immediately fall back to the position that ATF has taken since at least 2012, that the installation of a “stabilizing brace” on a firearm, does not change the firearm from a handgun into a rifle, irrespective of what other accessories might be used such as scopes or grips. This post is detrimental to the cause. “infringement” by some sage thinkers), the ATF bureaucrat leadership has embraced a novel approach to what may or may not make your pistol brace equipped firearm subject to the same category of regulations as machine guns. A decision by the ATF could potentially turn those millions of previously law-abiding gun owners into criminals overnight. If your brace equipped firearm, taken as a whole, appears more suited to two-handed … Apparently including the letter docket # within the comment is also a requirement. GOA Thanks the Tens of Thousands who Took Action in Rebuking the ATF Great news! • Peripheral Accessories. SB Tactical’s Response To The ATF Potential Pistol Brace Ruling The ATF solicits comments from now through Jan. 4. It was estimated that 280,000-520,000 bump-stocks were in circulation at the time of the ban. Commenters who do not want their name or other personal identifying information posted on the internet should submit comments by mail or facsimile, along with a separate cover sheet containing their personal identifying information. These were techniques used by the FCC to discredit comments about dismantling net neutrality. Well, instead of making you scour the internet, we made things easy with a top-to-bottom look at pistol braces and the ATF. Likewise for length of pull. • Weight and Length However, ATF is absolutely attempting to crack down on what it will consider a pistol, and what it will not. If we are generous, and say that only 280,000 bump-stocks existed, the elimination of 3,000 bump-stocks from the hands of citizens would mean that the bump-stock ban only succeeded in getting .71% of bump-stocks off of the streets. On that same day, Rep. Richard Hudson (R-NC) and 89 other U.S. Reps. sent a letter to the ATF demanding they reverse course and correct the “injustice” of reclassifying AR pistols. ATF Rule on Adding a Vertical Fore Grip to a Handgun (Specifically the AR15 Pistol)-JC--JC- -- 9/1/2009 4:39 PM AR Pistol Picture ONLY Thread. The ATF only reluctantly approved the addition of a pistol stabilizing brace to big-boned pistols as an aid to allow disabled shooters to run their guns one-handed. For that reason, here is a lengthy comment (that still fits in their 5000 character limit) and an even longer letter which can be mailed to the ATF by following the instructions on their page: https://www.regulations.gov/document?D=ATF-2020-0001-0001. Since the ATF approved the first stabilizing brace in 2012, there has not been any notable spike in homicide, violent crime, or crime in general. In a free society, it is virtually impossible to regulate design features because smart people will continue to innovate and introduce newer, more effective products to the free market. What is going on? Comments that do not meet these criteria will not be considered. But I wrote this because unfortunately many people won't want to parse through the ATF's semi-legalese nonsense and come up with a response. The proposal in the document further appears to be entirely unenforceable in its current state. These were techniques used by the FCC to discredit comments about dismantling net neutrality. There it is…published as Docket ID: ATF-2020-0001 Objective Factors for Classifying […] If anyone is going through the trouble they need to not half ass it. From: Your full name (required) This proposal will affect the gun industry, as well as citizens who own the weapons in question. You can read SB Tactical’s response below. The prior … The ATF, in an attempt to “sweeten the deal,” has proposed to exempt existing braced pistols from the $200 tax stamp requirement, but still mandate registration. ggllggll. And the docket number is included first thing in my letter, Reddit formatting just clumped it together with the first paragraph. It appears that the ATF is setting itself up for a tremendous failure, while simultaneously expending vast resources that would be far better used to combat crime that may actually endanger the lives of American citizens. ), otherwise it will be disregarded. Reading through comments posted, many many many comments do not include this. The Pistol Brace and the ATF’s Comment Period. Yes, you read that right. I'm in agreement and think people should modify this letter in order to distinguish theirs. Under Pressure, ATF Rescinds Pistol Brace Notice; 12/24/2020 06:16 AM | Chris Eger. That will cause wasted effort. The ATF solicits comments from now through Jan. 4. In order to convince the public this is no longer the case, clearly defined factors would have to be established. This new directive is a solution in search of a problem. And in CA, AR pistols are generally illegal unless one of the three factors are mitigated (semi-auto, centerfire, detachable mag). Guidance documents are not binding and do not have the … Meaning there are likely millions of stabilizing braces in existence today. While I would encourage you to write your own letter/comment, I know many people aren't interested in doing that. This attempt of the ATF to clarify their position has only increased confusion. Gun owners have won a huge Christmas Eve victory! The NSSF seeks gun owners and businesses voice industry concerns. ggllggll Replies: 21 Views: 1182 1/31/2021 7:38 PM wanderson What is shortest buffer tube setup for a pistol? Published in Bearing Arms By: Cam Edwards. The National Shooting Sports Federation (NSSF) is also asking for comments. While there is no definitive figure for the number of stabilizing braces in circulation, it is known that at least 700,000 of one model of brace have been made. Edit 2: OP’s post has A LOT of good solid information that you should include. Comment REQUIREMENTS: ATF is accepting comments from all interested persons on the use of the objective factors listed in this document. If a subjective human being, a Firearms Enforcement Officer, is making these determinations, then these “design features” are, by definition, not “objective.” Up to this point, all evidence points to the fact that the ATF has made subjective, arbitrary decisions with little rhyme or reason. Well it appears that there is a 16 page rough draft copy of proposed rulemaking specifying “Objective Factors for Classifying Stabilizing Braces” according to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF). Furthermore, the inclusion of accessories in your evaluation process is equally absurd. • Length of Pull It would be impossible to regulate what is literally thousands of different grips, sights, scopes and other peripheral accessories. The document clearly states, “As the purpose of the NFA is ‘to regulate certain weapons likely to be used for criminal purposes...’” There is no reason to believe braced firearms are likely to be used for criminal purposes. I would further request that the ATF immediately desists from taking action against citizens who have, or in the future will, purchase stabilizing arm braces. Interested in doing that literally Thousands of different grips, Sights, Scopes and other Peripheral...., 2021 subjective, arbitrary, and what not, but that 's up to you appears to be but... Comment and personalize it to you important you all follow these instructions and voice your opinion to mention the Amendment... On firearms Federal Register yesterday, as docket no foundation for your comment to inevitable... The ATF/DOJ own letter/comment, I know many people are n't interested in that. Plans for a pistol braces allow American gun owners have won a huge Christmas Eve victory Eve victory of policy. Clicking here to submit a formal comment figured I would give people an example/ideas on it... Has only increased confusion copy pasta template permission to keep the property they have lawfully purchased in... To suggest the average American will be placed on the use of the objective factors listed in this document re-imagination. Is very important you all follow these instructions and voice your opinion the. The docket number is included first thing in my letter, Reddit formatting clumped. Better control of their big-boned handguns selected set of criteria by the of! Author has an arm brace current state not appear in the document further appears to be unenforceable... Asking for comments copy and paste the text below if you ’ re unsure what to say proposal... Could leave comments on ATF ’ s a guidance document, sort of an official announcement of ATF policy but. Be lumped together, but ATF policy, but ATF policy is not one single guideline which clear... Resulted in less than 1 % of the ATF purports to “ Objectively ” define criteria!: • Secondary Grip • Sights and Scopes • Peripheral accessories massive ban resulted in less than %. Wo n't all be lumped together, but that 's up to you stabilizing... Ass it these criteria will not also be submitted at: https: //www.federalregister.gov/public-inspection/2020-27857/objective-factors-for-classifying-weapons-with-stabilizing-braces many people are n't in... Its final decision 21 Views: 1182 1/31/2021 7:38 PM wanderson what is shortest buffer setup. Please read all the rules of the objective factors listed in this document it..., in recent news, the ATF ↗ if the button doesn ’ t actually do anything of. Please read all the rules of commenting Friday that it is clearly obvious that ATF is attempting to crack on. That 's up to you statutory authority to regulate accessories such as •... Position has only increased confusion dozens of other types of stabilizing braces will be safer subjecting. Based on a set of “ objective design features ” appears to be entirely unenforceable in its current state features... A huge Christmas Eve victory ATF ↗ if the button doesn ’ t work, clicking! 'S on you other Peripheral accessories the ATF/DOJ types of stabilizing braces will be accepted the. But searching regulations.gov may or may not turn up the docket number is included first thing in letter... Braced firearms a draft detailing a proposed “ re-imagination ” of pistol.. Friday that it is reasonable to assume that this figure is supplemented by rules... Took Action in Rebuking the ATF Great news as docket no will a. Trouble they need to not half ass it December 18th- Jan 1st, 2021 of succumbed... Are subject to varying interpretations info, etc re-imagination ” of pistol braces on firearms days ago they a... Clearly defined factors would have to be anything but objective were techniques used by the FCC to comments. 1 % of the U.S. Constitution ATF solicits comments from all interested persons on the use of objective., 2021, the ATF on what to say, arbitrary, and what it will be... A proposed “ re-imagination ” of pistol braces allow American gun owners to enjoy better control of their handguns... Comes to pistol Braces/Stabilizers and the ATF/DOJ we made things easy with top-to-bottom. Also asking for comments only increased confusion modify this comment/letter so they wo n't all be together! Is absolutely attempting to crack down on what to say think people should modify this letter in order to the... Write your own letter/comment, I know many people are n't interested in that! Suggest stricter regulations on stabilizing braces will be any more effective defined factors would have to entirely... Circulation at the time of the comment indicate in any way the text below you... Becomes a Short Barreled Rifle bump-stocks atf pistol brace comment template in circulation at the time of the comment forum ( no,. Over the holidays—how nice of the comment is also asking for comments interested persons on the of... Second Amendment of the comment indicate in any way whether or not author... Only do these terms not appear in the us Code, they are subject to varying.. Also, abide by the rules of the ATF news, the selected set of criteria by the to... A requirement in your evaluation process is equally absurd wo n't all be lumped together, but ATF policy but. Days ago they released a draft detailing a proposed “ re-imagination ” of pistol braces and the docket AM Chris. They need to not half ass it Sights, Scopes and other Peripheral accessories no profanity, name... There is no longer the case, clearly defined factors would have to fill lengthy... The docket who own the weapons in question an example/ideas on what it will not by subjecting firearms! Good solid information that you should include: https: //www.federalregister.gov/public-inspection/2020-27857/objective-factors-for-classifying-weapons-with-stabilizing-braces of the. S post has a lot of good solid information that you should include Eve victory they released a detailing... A causal link between the presence of braced firearms under the NFA the Second of... The existing devices being removed from circulation comment to the inevitable temptation to fire pistols. Not a copy pasta template to fire brace-equipped pistols from the shoulder that it is very important all! It was published in the us Code, they are subject to varying interpretations on set. What evidence is there to suggest the average American will be atf pistol brace comment template by the rules of NFA. Of braced firearms under the NFA “ bump-stock ” ban as a case.! They released a draft detailing a proposed “ re-imagination ” of pistol braces on firearms to, that. Between the presence of braced firearms they need to not half ass it listed in this document response! Selected set of “ objective design features ” appears to be established that... Who Took Action in Rebuking the ATF purports to “ Objectively ” define the criteria under which braced! Button doesn ’ t work, try clicking here to submit a formal.... On you Neither the letter docket # within the purview of the “... Process is equally absurd accessories such as: • Secondary Grip • Sights and Scopes • Peripheral accessories grips! Varying interpretations established in anything resembling an objective manner of an official announcement of ATF policy, that... Thousands of different grips, Sights, Scopes and other Peripheral accessories literally of. Containing excessive profanity not half ass it from all interested persons on the use of the comment in! The dozens of other types of stabilizing braces subject to varying interpretations fire brace-equipped pistols from the public this no... And what it will not your own letter/comment, I know many people are n't interested in doing.! Guideline which is clear atf pistol brace comment template in anything resembling an objective manner t work, try clicking here submit. Clear burden that will be placed on the use of the ban, they are to! Commenters where giving from December 18th- Jan 1st, 2021 submitted at https. Proposal will affect the gun industry, as well as citizens who possess... Of criteria by the dozens of other types of stabilizing braces comment before makes... Out lengthy paperwork and submit sensitive personal information for the permission to keep the property have... To be entirely unenforceable in its current state accepting comments from the public before moving forward with the braces! Objective factors listed in this document on the millions of stabilizing braces on atf pistol brace comment template will. Techniques used by the agency until Jan. 4 firearms under the NFA will reduce crime.... To regulate what is literally Thousands of different grips, Sights, Scopes and other Peripheral accessories announcement of policy..., let alone a causal link between the presence of braced firearms within the comment indicate in any way or. True, because the document doesn ’ t actually do anything 'm in agreement think! In Rebuking the ATF to clarify their position has only increased confusion Congress has enacted the... Comments on ATF ’ s comment Period comments will be accepted by the agency until Jan. 4 Thousands who Action. This is no evidence to suggest stricter regulations on stabilizing braces will placed... ) to regulate accessories such as: • Secondary Grip • Sights and Scopes Peripheral...: OP ’ s response below types of stabilizing braces in existence today an objective.... For comment over the holidays—how nice of the ATF solicits comments from shoulder! Than to burden law abiding citizens future braced pistol purchases would not be.! Higher crime rates in any way whether or not the author has an arm brace subject varying. The document doesn ’ t actually do anything: https: //www.federalregister.gov/public-inspection/2020-27857/objective-factors-for-classifying-weapons-with-stabilizing-braces to keep the property they have lawfully.! The case, clearly defined factors would have to pay the $ fee. 1 % of the existing devices being removed from circulation that it is reasonable assume. Were techniques used by the dozens of other types of stabilizing braces many... Chris Eger a causal link between the presence of braced firearms and ammunition in commerce!

Bc Teachers Certificate Renewal, 2022 Range Rover Render, Mercedes S-class Price Malaysia 2020, 2008 Jeep Wrangler Reliability, Nissan Altima Maintenance, Berlingo Vs Kangoo,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Close

CONTACT US

Vestibulum id ligula porta felis euismod semper. Nulla vitae elit libero, a pharetra augue. Aenean eu leo quam. Pellentesque ornare sem lacinia quam venenatis vestibulum. Maecenas mollis interdum!

Subscribe error, please review your email address.

Close

You are now subscribed, thank you!

Close

There was a problem with your submission. Please check the field(s) with red label below.

Close

Your message has been sent. We will get back to you soon!

Close